June 23, 2007

Woman registers her dog to vote to expose flaws in system

Posted by LSU @ 8:37 am

I know Perri beat me to it, but here is my take on the Lady and her dog. 

The County should thanks her for exposing the loopholes that make fraud in King County so easy to commit but instead they are punishing her.

Instead of dealing with the law's obvious flaws, they will bully her with threats and intimidation.  This is senseless prosecution and retribution for poking the sleeping giant in the eye.  Period.

Woman registers her dog to vote; prosecutors growl

Jane Balogh had a pretty good idea who was calling when the phone rang and the caller asked for Duncan M. MacDonald.

Duncan is the dog Balogh registered as a voter seven months before the November 2006 election.

Duncan's absentee-ballot envelope was signed with a picture of a paw print.

That is the only thing that gave it away, isn't that ironic?  Had she scrawled a signature they would have accepted it.

"You can't sign with a paw print," the election worker told Balogh on Nov. 9.

"I said, 'he can if he's a dog,' " answered Balogh, a 66-year-old grandmother and Army veteran who lives in Federal Way.

The election worker told her a supervisor would call, but she never heard from anyone.

After making her point — how easy it is for a voter to register illegally — Balogh will be arraigned in King County Superior Court on Tuesday on a misdemeanor charge of making a false statement to a public official.

If she declines to plead guilty, prosecutors told her in a letter this week, they will file a felony charge of providing false information on a voter-registration application. She doesn't plan to contest the misdemeanor: "I'm not going to claim to be innocent when I know I'm guilty."

Bryan Suits had her on the radio tonight, and offered to pay her fine, but she refused.  She knew what she did in civil disobedience was against the law and is willing to pay the price.  But the prosecution against her serves no purpose, and eliminating the flaws that allowed her to do this is not even being considered.

Those who actually intend to commit fraud and not just prove a point are still open to do so.

Balogh's crime was signing Duncan's name on a registration card under a declaration that he meets all the requirements to vote. She submitted ballots in his name in the September and November 2006 and May 2007 elections. She wrote "VOID" on the ballots, and didn't cast any votes.

Balogh, who lives with Duncan, an Australian shepherd-terrier mix, and four other dogs and four cats, registered her dog as a protest of a 2005 state voter-registration statute that she says makes it too easy for noncitizens to vote. She put her phone bill in Duncan's name, then used the phone bill as identification to register him as a voter.

"I wasn't trying to do anything fraudulent. I was trying to prove that our system is flawed. So I got myself in trouble," she says.

If she accepts the plea deal offered by prosecutors, they won't ask for jail time but will recommend she be sentenced to 10 hours of community service, pay a $250 fine and commit no other crimes for a year.

Acting Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg says his office "can't simply look the other way. They say you should let sleeping dogs lie, but you can't let voting dogs vote."

Yea ha ha.  Yet they won't deal with the mail box voters, the double voters, the missing votes or any of the many problems in King County.

This prosecution is a Nifong-ish act of retribution.

I applaud her for not just doing it to expose the flaws, but for having the guts to stand up to the penalty of civil disobedience unlike the average liberal who whines to get out of the consequence of their actions.

 Trackposted to ST, Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson's Website, Right Truth, Big Dog's Weblog, The Pet Haven Blog, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Pursuing Holiness, third world county, The Uncooperative Blogger, stikNstein… has no mercy, Nuke's news and views, Pirate's Cove, The Right Nation, The Pink Flamingo, Church and State, CatSynth.com, Right Pundits, http://morewhat.com/wordpress/?p=1805, The Random Yak, DeMediacratic Nation, 123beta, Adam's Blog, On the Horizon, Webloggin, The Bullwinkle Blog, Cao's Blog, , The Florida Masochist, Colloquium, Conservative Cat, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Azamatteroprinciple - A new blog dedicated to fighting pork barrel spending, High Desert Wanderer, The Yankee Sailor, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Filed under: Elections, Northwest

4 Comments »

TrackBack URI

  1. On June 23, 2007 at 1:34 pm, PerriNelson wrote:

    She does deserve prosecution. She also deserves a pardon. Unfortunately she’ll get the one and not the other.
     
    Our election laws need to be fixed, but it won’t happen as long as fraud serves to keep the current corrupt lot in power.

  2. On June 23, 2007 at 1:35 pm, PerriNelson wrote:

    Oh, and Andrews Dad beat me to it by a couple of hours.

  3. On June 23, 2007 at 4:41 pm, LSU wrote:

    Which only proves that great minds think alike.

  4. On June 24, 2007 at 6:24 pm, Cheryl Goodwin wrote:

    Do you guys know if there are any efforts to help Jane Balogh?  Perhaps an email campaign to urge the prosecutor to give her a pardon?  Thank you.

This entry comment RSS.

Leave a comment




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>